Wednesday, May 30, 2012

How a U.S. Radar Station in the Negev Affects a Potential Israel-Iran Clash

U.S. Army

On a desert hilltop in the remote southwest of Israel stands a compelling argument against any notion that the Jewish state will launch an attack on Iran without the United States. The discreet complex atop Mt. Keren is a U.S. military installation, and the 100 U.S. service members who staff it are the only foreign troops stationed in Israel. Most are guards; a few are support. The technicians are recognizable by the protective suits they wear to shield them from the extraordinary amounts of radiation generated by the no less extraordinary apparatus the base is built around.

The small, rectangular-shaped portable radar peeking around a concrete blast wall is so advanced it can see over the horizon, and so sensitive it can spot a softball tossed in the air from 2,900 miles away. (Tehran is a mere 1,000 miles away to the northwest.) On Mt. Keren, the X-band radar is indeed pointed northwest, toward Iran, where it could detect a Shahab-3 missile launched toward Israel just seconds into its flight ? and six to seven minutes earlier than Israel would know from its own radar, called Green Pine.

(LIST: Five Tips for President Obama on Nuclear Negotiations with Iran)

The extra time means a great deal. Six additional minutes increases by at least 60% the time Israeli officials would have to sound sirens that will send civilians scrambling into bomb shelters. It also substantially increases the chances of launching interceptors to knock down the incoming missile before it reaches Israel, hiking the likelihood its wreckage or warhead falls in, say, the wastes of the Jordanian desert rather than Israel's heavily populated coastal plain. And should the interceptor miss, the extra time might allow for the launch of a second one.

All this is possible, however, only if U.S. officials choose to share the information, because only Americans have eyes on the radar. And if it's difficult to imagine a U.S. commander-in-chief choosing to withhold an early warning that could save civilian lives of a close ally, both sides recognize that if the Iranian missiles were launched in retaliation for an Israeli air strike, the onus might be on the Israeli government that set such events in motion. In any event, military officials and outside analysts say that uncertainty can only inhibit any Israeli impulse to "go it alone."

The setting of the unmarked U.S. compound, in a stretch of desert barely five miles from the Egyptian border, captures the situation. The state-of-the-art radar is tucked into a landscape buzzing with Israeli military posts and training operations. Israeli infantry drill on broken ground to either side of the road approaching the hilltop installation, which is surrounded by a chain link fence and a yellow metal gate. The guards who come out to meet visitors are plainclothes members of the Israeli Ministry of Defense agency responsible for security at Israel's most sensitive sites, including the Dimona nuclear facility to the north.

(MORE: Why Netanyahu's Visit to Discuss Iran Puts Obama in a Political Minefield)

Inside the wire, however, the chain of command is American. In the one-story building beside the radar, technically called the Army-Navy Transportable Surveillance Radar, or AN/TPY-2, the data flows first to technicians' readouts, then on to California, where the U.S. Missile Defense Agency also registers feeds from satellites and sea-borne sensors. If their computers recognize an ascending fireball as a hostile missile launch, U.S. commanders may pass the information to their Israeli counterparts.

The entire system is of course built on the assumption that they will. The American and Israeli militaries have meshed their missile defense systems so snugly that they operate a joint command center, located on an Israeli military base near Tel Aviv. The Arrow interceptor missile that would be launched to knock down the attack is itself a joint-effort of the Pentagon and the Kirya, as Israeli's defense headquarters is known. Come October, some 5,000 American troops will travel to Israel for their largest joint exercise ever, one constructed entirely around missile defense.

But the Israelis are keenly aware that, in this case, information is power, and Washington has the right to withhold it. "We share a lot, but there's a valve on the pipeline, and it's a one-way valve," says a Western military official involved in the program.

The workaday reality of the U.S. radar ? it has been operating since 2009 ? also undercuts the notion of Israel launching a surprise attack on Iran that would also take Washington unawares. Not only does it see all traffic at Israeli air bases, it would certainly detect any large scale or other unusual patterns, including preparations for a massive air assault. Allowing the Americans that capability was a trade-off Israeli officials conceded only grudgingly, as TIME reported when the radar installation was announced in 2008.

"It's about the United States hugging the Israelis," says an American missile expert outside of government. The intense military cooperation between Washington and Jerusalem, which both sides agree is the closest it's ever been, not only helps assure Israel's security. It also tethers Israel's military to the Pentagon. Sometimes the benefits are frankly political: When Israel's Iron Dome anti-missile system won the heart of the Israeli public by downing short-range rockets out of the Gaza Strip, sparing Israeli cities, Congress quickly authorized $200 million to purchase nine more.

(MORE: What Lies? Beneath the Mysterious History of an Iranian Nuclear Site)

But the X-band radar installation offers both obvious advantages and what one Israeli official termed "golden handcuffs."

"It's a very sophisticated, eye-watering type of system, with a very powerful capability of precision," says the U.S. missile expert. "It was an X-band radar which was used in Operation Burnt Frost when we shot down that satellite from an Aegis ship several years back that was in a low, decaying orbit. We didn't just hit a bullet with a bullet, we hit a spot on a bullet."

The Negev base was outfitted and staffed by the U.S. European Command, which covers Israel. "For security reasons we can't talk too much about that gadget," says Capt. John Ross, a EUCOM spokesman. Declining a TIME reporter's request to visit the facility, the command insted issued a statement that seems calculatingly bland, at least until the final sentence: "The United States and Israel have a long-standing partnership in addressing issues of regional and global security. Consistent with our partnership and with our commitment to the security of our partners in the region and around the world, and at the request of the Government of Israel, the U.S. military has deployed a defensive radar system to Israel to help maintain regional security and provide a useful deterrent to any missile attacks. The Army Navy Transportable Surveillance Radar (or AN/TPY-2) is considered to be one of the most powerful systems available to track medium- to long-range ballistic missiles. The AN/TPY-2 will remain U.S. owned and operated."

COVER STORY: Will Netanyahu Choose War or Peace?

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/time/world/~3/NRY7Tfs7CNM/0,8599,2115955,00.html

major world newspapers nbc world news today nbc world news tonight nbc world news with diane sawyer nhk world news japan

Boy Scouts' Anti-Gay Policy Challenged

Eagle Scout Zach Wahls challenged the Boy Scouts of America's anti-gay policy today when he delivered three boxes of petitions demanding change, signed by more than 275,000 people.

Wahls, 20, presented the petitions during the Boy Scouts' National Annual Meeting in Orlando, Fla., on behalf of Jennifer Tyrrell, an Ohio mom who was removed as the den leader of her 7-year-old son's Cub Scout troop in April because of her sexual orientation. The Boy Scouts are the parent organization of the Cub Scouts.

Wahls is the author of "My Two Moms" and a video of his three-minute speech before Iowa legislators urging them not to pass a constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriage and civil unions went viral in February 2011.

The Change.org petition called for Tyrrell's reinstatement and a change in policy for the organization.

"It is time for the Boy Scouts of America to reconsider its policy of exclusivity against gay youth and leaders," the petition reads. "Please sign this petition to call for an end of discrimination in an organization that is shaping the future."

The petition has garnered support from celebrities including Ellen DeGeneres, Julianne Moore, Ricky Martin, Jesse Tyler Ferguson and "Hunger Games" star Josh Hutcherson among others.

After delivering the petitions, Wahls met privately with three Boy Scout representatives.

"It went well. It was an honest conversation, but a productive one," Wahls told ABCNews.com today. "The fact that the meeting happened is a really positive indicator."

PHOTO: Zach Wahls, an Eagle Scout from Iowa, delivers 275,000 signatures to the Boy Scouts at their National Annual Meeting in Florida, May 30, 2012.

Change.org

Zach Wahls, an Eagle Scout from Iowa,... View Full Size
PHOTO: Zach Wahls, an Eagle Scout from Iowa, delivers 275,000 signatures to the Boy Scouts at their National Annual Meeting in Florida, May 30, 2012.
Gay Boy Scouts Leader Fired Watch Video
Girl Scouts Get Lesson in Fake Money Watch Video
Boy Scout Leader Fatally Stabbed on Hiking Trip Watch Video

Wahls said the Boy Scout leaders were "receptive" of his ideas and he believes the conversation is a positive first step in overcoming cultural prejudices.

"It's a dialogue that continues to be difficult for many people," he said. "But the members of our community are the ones that pay the price, not the organization as a whole."

Following the meeting, the Boy Scouts released a statement that said they have "no plans" to change their policy.

"The Boy Scouts of America teaches its members to treat those with different opinions with courtesy and respect at all times," Deron Smith, BSA director of public relations, said in a statement. "Today, Scouting officials accepted signatures from an online petition and shared the purpose of its membership policy."

"Scouting maintains that is youth development program is not the appropriate environment to introduce or discuss, in any way, same-sex attraction," he wrote. "Parents and caregivers should have the right to decide when and how to discuss the issue with their children."

Wahls is not deterred by the statement.

"President Obama said the exact same thing up until the day he endorsed same-sex marriage. I expect we'll see a similar progression from the Boy Scouts," he said. "Obviously, this is a very long-standing policy and I don't think it we'll see a change today, this week or even this year. But over the coming months, we'll continue to take steps in this evolution."

Tyrrell, 32, was not in Florida for the delivery of the petitions, but will join Wahls at the GLAAD Media Awards in San Francisco on Saturday. She told ABCNews.com she is grateful for all of the support.

"I didn't expect it, of course," she said. "It's been humbling. It's been terrifying. It's been exciting. It's been a whole bag of mixed emotions."

Tyrrell started the petition when she was removed from her year-long position as den leader because of her sexuality.

"I actually felt devastated. I was heartbroken. I cried a lot. I still feel sad about it a lot," she said. "It's 2012 and nobody deserved to be treated like that."

She said that all of this is mostly sad for her 7-year-old son Cruz who is missing out on all of the positive elements of the Boy Scouts.

When asked if Cruz understands what is happening and that one of his moms has become the face of a movement, Tyrrell said, "To the extent of his ability, he knows what's going on. He's kind of like, 'Boo the Boy Scouts.' He doesn't understand discrimination. He's never been taught that. He doesn't see people by the color of their skin or who they love. He just loves everyone and doesn't understand how others couldn't."

Source: http://feeds.abcnews.com/click.phdo?i=8ad6d899c19bb21fb5e7700c5be13c14

world news for kids 2011 world news for kids articles world news for kids children world news for kids egypt world news for kids online

West mulls military action against Syria: All-out chaos, or more killings?

5:18

Chossudovsky: Military Intervention in Syria Will Lead to Extended War

Chossudovsky: Military Intervention in Syria Will Lead to Extended War

The fighting for the Syrian rebel stronghold of Hama continues, with the reported number of victims reaching 100. Meanwhile the UN Security Council session discussed the latest developments of the civil conflict, but failed to produce a resolution. Elite troops of the Syrian army were sent to Hama to fight what protesters call a desperate general population and the authorities call terrorists. Syrian state news agency SANA says the rebels there have captured military depots and use the weapons, including land mines, machine guns and grenade launchers against army units. Opposition says the army is using tanks and other armor in the city, shooting at residential areas. Official Damascus denies the allegations. Anti-governmental activists state the number of people killed in the conflict over several days as high as 100. Monday's confrontation resulted in 24 deaths, they say. The government did not publish any number of casualties, but confirmed that some officers and soldiers have been killed or wounded in the operation. The military say the troops are being targeted by sniper fire from rooftops. Several European countries and the United States pushed for a condemnation of Damascus's actions in Hama during a UN Security Council session on Monday night. However Russia and China said they would veto such a move, while observer members Brazil, India and South Africa backed this position. Members of the Council agreed that the situation in Syria is of concern for the <b>...</b>

6:16

After West Deceived UN Security Council over Libya, Russia and China Veto Action Against Syria

After West Deceived UN Security Council over Libya, Russia and China Veto Action Against Syria

After 7 month of vicious onslaught against Libya bloodthirsty NATO demands destruction of so far independent Syria: France - UK - US (FUKUS) have launched the most sickening assault against common decency, morals, international law and human goodwill since Hitler's goose-stepping Nazis sent millions to the concentration camps. Here is the first series of questions placed to the three ringleaders of this most shocking terrorist outrage. 1. What is your reaction to the fact that the forces under your commend murdered the three grandchildren of Colonel Gaddafi? Why haven't you even issued an apology? Would you like the same thing to happen to your families? And if it did, should we "apologize" or mumble the word "regret"? 2. What is your reaction to NATO's murderous terrorist strikes against civilians? You will be aware of the scope of your carnage in Libya which makes 9/11 look like a picnic for fairy godmothers. How do you feel about holding joint responsibility for the murder of tens of thousands of people (up to 63000 to date)? You couldn't care less, could you? 3. If it is NATO's mandate to protect civilians, then why did you strafe their water supply? Are you aware that this is a war crime? Be honest, it was "to break their backs", wasn't it? 4. Why did the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office support a group listed in its terrorist list - LIFG, in direct violation of the UK's Terrorism Act? Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) The LIFG seeks to replace the current <b>...</b>

4:35

Russia and China veto UN resolution on Syria

Russia and China veto UN resolution on Syria

From: Russia Today Russia, China veto UN Security Council resolution on Syria Published: 04 February, 2012, 21:05 Edited: 05 February, 2012, 02:29 The United Nations Security Council has voted on a draft resolution concerning the ongoing violence in Syria. The United Nations Security Council has just voted on a draft resolution concerning the ongoing violence in Syria. Russia and China were the only voting members to oppose the draft. And as permanent members of the UNSC, they had the option to use veto power to block the draft's passage. Beijing and Moscow have both taken issue with the draft's vague wording, which they say leaves the door open for possible international military intervention in Syria and creates a picture of the current situation that favors opposition forces over the Assad government. American Ambassador Susan Rice told the Security Council following the vote that the US was "disgusted" at Russia and China's decision to go against the resolution. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also warned that more blood would be shed in Syria if a resolution was not reached soon. rt.com ..................................................................... SYRIA. TEXT OF LEAKED ARAB LEAGUE MISSION REPORT Report Reveals Media Lies Regarding Syria Commentary by Michel Chossudovsky Global Research, February 1, 2012 Global Research Editor's Note We bring to the attention of our readers the Observers' Mission Report of the League of Arab States to Syria. The report <b>...</b>

13:48

Hillary Clinton, Looking for Love in Other Places

Hillary Clinton, Looking for Love in Other Places

What we heard Hillary say about the savagery against Muammar Gaddafi is manifestation of centuries of insanity in thinking that the hand of mercy would forever be withheld from them. They are well into judgement. ******* Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassem Al Thani and Arab League Secretary General Nabil al-Araby briefed the Security Council on the Arab initiative to end the unrest in Syria at the meeting, which was held in New York on Tuesday. The two leaders defended the draft resolution which endorses the Arab League plan. The draft resolution demands that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad comply with the Arab League plan, which calls on him to resign and hand over power to his vice president. However, the Arab League secretary general emphasized that military intervention was not being considered. "We are attempting to avoid any foreign intervention, particularly military intervention... We have always stressed full respect of the security, sovereignty, and territorial integrity of the Syrian people," al-Araby said during the meeting. The UN meeting was held despite Russian and Chinese opposition to the draft resolution. Russia has vowed to veto any resolution that calls on Assad to step down, and Russian officials say such a measure could pave the way for military action. Earlier in the day, Britain, the United States, and France held a closed-door meeting on Syria in New York. Damascus says over 2000 members of the Syrian security forces have been killed <b>...</b>

4:25

China and Russia Veto Sanctions On Syria

China and Russia Veto Sanctions On Syria

UN Security Council's proposal to condemn Syria's act of violence on its citizens was overruled together by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and Russia, raising anger and disappointment from other foreign leaders. Comments point out that the CCP's opposition of the proposal is anguish and pity towards the dictatorship ruling Syria, but it cannot stop the wave of democratization in the Middle East, Asia and North Africa. Syrians started anti-government protests in March, asking President Assad to step down. The Syrian government called on military forces to suppress public protest, which they called "riots," which resulted in more than 2700 deaths already. The US announced on April 29 its intentions to impose sanctions on Syrian officials, and on May 9, the EU also announced that actions would be taken against the Syrian government. On August 3, the UN Security Council criticized the Syrian government for human rights violations and the use of violence against civilians. The wording of the proposal was edited three times before the vote on October 4. However, the CCP and Russia still hold opposition votes; the US and British UN' ambassadors left the meeting in anger. US State Secretary Hillary Clinton criticized the UN Security Council for "shirking responsibility," British Foreign Secretary William Hague showed disappointment, French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe angrily condemned al-Assad as the "dictator killing people," German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle <b>...</b>

6:40

Ambassador Susan Rice To UN- USA Outraged At Russia, China VETO on Syria Slaughter 10-5-11

Ambassador Susan Rice To UN- USA Outraged At Russia, China VETO on Syria Slaughter 10-5-11

Madame President, the United States is outraged that this Council has utterly failed to address an urgent moral challenge and a growing threat to regional peace and security. Several members have sought for weeks to weaken and strip bare any text that would have defended the lives of innocent civilians from Asad's brutality. Today, two members have vetoed a vastly watered-down text that doesn't even mention sanctions. Let me be clear: the United States believes it is past time that this Council assume its responsibilities and impose tough, targeted sanctions and an arms embargo on the Asad regime, as we have done domestically. Yet today, the courageous people of Syria can now clearly see who on this Council supports their yearning for liberty and universal human rights?and who does not. And during this season of change, the people of the Middle East can now see clearly which nations have chosen to ignore their calls for democracy and instead prop up desperate, cruel dictators. Those who oppose this resolution and give cover to a brutal regime will have to answer to the Syrian people?and, indeed, to people across the region who are pursuing the same universal aspirations. The record is clear. For more than six months, the Asad regime has deliberately unleashed violence, torture, and persecution against peaceful protesters, human rights defenders, and their families. The High Commissioner for Human Rights has already warned that the Syrian government's appalling actions <b>...</b>

2:04

UN Divided Over Syrian Resolution

UN Divided Over Syrian Resolution

UN Divided Over Syrian Resolution In response to the increasing bloodshed in Syria, European powers have re-entered discussions to draft a UN resolution that condemns the Government for its brutal crackdown on protesters. The Security Council, which first met on August 1, failed to reach an agreement after two days of talks. After months of dispute and deadlock over Syria in the council, the intensification of military violence in the region seemed to radicalize many of the divided members, who felt that it may be time to resort to more direct engagement. However, practical action from the council has remained paralyzed by disagreements, with the resolution coming to no conclusions after Russia and China, both allied with President Bashar Al-Assad, threatened to veto the bill. After the Security Council discussions ended on Tuesday, Russia's Ambassador to the United Nations, Vitaly Churkin, told journalists an agreement, so far, has not been possible: "The recent developments in Syria have been very grave, and we are concerned about the violence and the escalation of the conflict and we think that under these circumstances the Security Council could and should send a positive signal in favor of political accommodation and an end to the violence. We agreed to refer back to our capitals and then reconvene tomorrow in order to see whether a common position is possible between 15 members of the Security Council." Churkin also added that any resolution on Syria must not lead <b>...</b>

7:35

Only Venezuela Brave Enough to Tell Truth about NATO Aggressions at Highjacked United Nations

Only Venezuela Brave Enough to Tell Truth about NATO Aggressions at Highjacked United Nations

The Foreign Ministers of the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America, meeting in Caracas, Venezuela on 9 September 2011, recalling the Special Communiqu� of the Political Council on 4 March 2011 and the Special Communiqu� of the Ministerial Social Council on 19 March 2011, condemns the NATO intervention in Libya and its illegal military aggression, carried out under the cover of a UN Security Council resolution, opportunistically exploiting the situation of the internal political conflict in that country. The ALBA foreign ministers denounce the NATO for carrying out a military operation for regime change in Libya under the doctrine of preventive war, manipulating the UN to suit its geopolitical and economic interests in violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1973. The ALBA foreign ministers demand the immediate and unconditional cessation of the NATO bombings and military intervention in the Libyan territory. The ALBA foreign ministers deplore the fact that the NATO has disregarded the persistent efforts of the African Union in search of a solution to the internal conflict in Libya based on dialogue to achieve peace. The ALBA foreign ministers also deplore the complicity of various major international media, which have colluded with those interested in aggression and lent themselves to the purpose of distorting information about the state of affairs in Libya. The ALBA foreign ministers issue their most urgent warning on the danger that the Libyan precedent <b>...</b>

5:41

Michel Collon: US Fabricates and Finances Arab Opposition Groups

Michel Collon: US Fabricates and Finances Arab Opposition Groups

The UN Security Council is examining France and Britain's draft resolution, which condemns the ongoing violence in Syria. Russia and China said they would oppose any toughly-worded documents or hasty action. Following two hours of closed-door consultations within the UN Security Council, France and the UK did not garner enough support for a resolution they introduced on Syria. Discussions at the UN will continue over the next few days, as the UK and France continue campaigning for support. The draft resolution -- which calls on Damascus to stop using violence against protestors, demands those responsible for civilian casualties be held accountable, and allows for humanitarian aid to be sent to Syria -- will be presented to the UN Security Council. The draft also urges other countries not to supply weapons to Damascus. The resolution already has support from Germany and Portugal, British Prime Minister David Cameron said on Wednesday. "If anyone votes against that resolution or tries to veto it, that should be on their conscience," he added. Earlier on Monday, French Foreign minister Alain Juppe said the UN cannot just silently watch as the situation develops there. He believes reforms in Syria "are dead" and that President Bashar Assad has no right to rule the country anymore. Russia and China, both veto-wielding members of the UN Security Council, said they would oppose a resolution on Syria. "The international community is drowning in [the Libyan situation]. That's why <b>...</b>

4:01

TEW'S Syria Recap

TEW'S Syria Recap

Last month, Russia and China vetoed a Western-backed UN Security Council resolution condemning the bloodshed in Syria. They have argued that NATO misused a previous UN measure authorizing the use of force to protect civilians in Libya to justify months of air strikes and to promote regime change. Yesterday the UN general assembly's human rights committee resolution, drafted by Britain, France and Germany, received 122 votes in favour, 13 against and 41 abstentions. Thirteen Arab states, including the six Arab co-sponsors, voted for it, as did Turkey. An Arab League committee has given Syria 24 hours to agree to allow an observer mission into the country or it could face sanctions. France will seek Arab support on Thursday for a humanitarian corridor in Syria NOTE: I posted a bulletin earlier where the RUSSIAN WARSHIPS off of Syria is "In Question"... Russia is neither confirming or denying it... and supposedly the original source of the info was Syrian. Israeli officials: Turkey nearing military intervention in Syria www.haaretz.com Arabs to ask UN for support to resolve Syria crisis www.google.com Arab League threatens sanctions against Syria www.usatoday.com Syria Has Few Friends But UN Punitive Action Is Elusive www.huffingtonpost.com UN condemns Syria`s Regime crackdown on Protesters www.dp-news.com Russian Warships' Cold Messages from Warm Waters www.turkishweekly.net France seeks Arab backing for Syria intervention www.reuters.com Turkey confronted with possible <b>...</b>

6:11

Lizzie Phelan; ' Arab League report on Syria flawed '

Lizzie Phelan; ' Arab League report on Syria flawed '

Mon Jan 23, 2012 - The prominent journalist says the Arab League report on Syria is flawed because it states that a threat exists on the people and government, yet it proposes the army should stand down. Press TV has conducted an interview with Lizzie Phelan, freelance journalist, to further discuss the issue. Press TV: Some of the major points of the report by the head of the Arab League monitors in Syria: They didn't face any problems, they say, from the Syrian govt.; violence has subsided, they say, despite claims by the armed opposition; the fact that the opposition are armed; and that there were exaggerations over the way the monitors conducted their mission. Overall, how do you see the report? Phelan: Well, of course, there are from the Syrian government's point of view some positive things that have come out of the report, but overall they're not very happy with the report because they have recommend that the president hand over power to the deputy. And the Syrian government has called this a blatant violation of their sovereignty. Of course, there is a political process happening here in Syria. Just a couple of weeks ago, the president has announced reforms including a new constitution that would be put to a referendum in a very short space of time. And while the Arab League has said that violence has subsided since the observers have been in the country, it's difficult to know what they're comparing it to because before they arrived the only reports about <b>...</b>

3:03

Build up to WW3 - RUSSIA & CHINA 'Despicable' Over SYRIA say Hillary Clinton

Build up to WW3 - RUSSIA & CHINA 'Despicable' Over SYRIA say Hillary Clinton

From SkyNews UK: US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has slammed Russia and China as "despicable" for opposing UN action on Syria following a meeting of Western and Arab powers. At an international conference of the 'Friends of Syria' group of nations, up to 70 delegates gathered to try to find a way to end the bloodshed in Syria. The world leaders called on President Bashar al Assad to stop the killing of civilians and allow emergency aid into the country. But the international efforts to resolve the crisis were criticised by Qatar and Saudi Arabia, who want Arab peacekeepers to enter Syria in order to enforce a ceasefire. Western powers, including Britain and the US, favour a diplomatic approach to put more pressure on the Assad regime, including more economic sanctions. :: Who's who in the Assad regime? As the concern over the humanitarian crisis grows, the Red Cross confirmed they, along with the Syrian Red Crescent, had been allowed into the besieged Syrian city of Homs to evacuate several wounded people. Inside Syria Homs has been under constant bombardment by government forces for three weeks and hundreds of civilians are reported to have been killed. On Friday aid workers entered the Babr Amr district to help those in need of medical assistance and managed to safely move seven people to a hospital in another part of the city. It came as Mrs Clinton used strong language to denounce Russia and China for their attitudes toward the crisis in Syria. The two nations <b>...</b>

7:50

Syria US Ambassador Susan Rice Disgusted! by Russia China -Charges leveled re Libya ! 1

Syria US Ambassador Susan Rice Disgusted! by Russia China -Charges leveled re Libya ! 1

4 PART SERIES PLAYLIST www.youtube.com Let us read UN 1973 and see who should be "disgusted" References: www.cnn.com en.wikipedia.org www.bbc.co.uk www.youtube.com sabah-tube.magnify.net www.guardian.co.uk www.alarabiya.net old.post-gazette.com nationalinterest.org www.thenational.ae www.cnn.com Susan Rice is disgusted at China and Russia for not helping her with her plans to reshape Syria. Ms Rice: I have been waiting for the showdown wherein you would try to do to others what you did in Libya. You forgot 1 thing this time. The Internet. We publish the truths you suppress. Let us hear your remarks, And then the respected news source -- "The Real News" before we decide what level of disgust we should have with BRIC. I wonder who crafted your little talking points this time. I recorded all your lies last time. In a document called "Nato Intervention in Libya: The Washington Establishment Media Narrative The true disgust in the world is with your lies. You hurriedly rushed through UN res 1973 You conducted 25000 aerial missions dropping 10000 payloads of munitions on an army the size of the NYPD. Libya has 6 to 10 trillion dollars' worth of resources. Each soldier therefore guarded 200 million dollars in treasure, not a good ratio, apparently with the Wests Invasion Capitalism. Instead of competing with Brazil Russia India and China -- you intend to render them meaningless by penetrating them with your finance institutions accumulating stock in their companies, as you allow <b>...</b>

4:48

OBAMA IMPEACHMENT EXPOSED! Awaken the Masses. Media Cover-up ALEX JONES

OBAMA IMPEACHMENT EXPOSED! Awaken the Masses. Media Cover-up ALEX JONES

OBAMA IMPEACHMENT EXPOSED! Awaken the Masses, Share and make Viral! ALEX JONES The impeachment of war criminal Barack Obama has begun but the globalist controlled traitor media is blacking this huge news out. "Expressing the sense of congress that the use of offensive military force by a president without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution," the resolution states. Jones introduced his resolution after Obama's Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey told Senator Jeff Sessions during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing last week that they would seek "international permission" to attack Syria. Congrerss would not be consulted, but merely informed of the decision. "Our goal would be to seek international permission and we would... come to the Congress and inform you and determine how best to approach this, whether or not we would want to get permission from the Congress -- I think those are issues we would have to discuss as we decide what to do here," Panetta told Sessions. "Well, I'm almost breathless about that," the senator from Alabama replied, "because what I heard you say is, 'We're going to seek international approval, and then we'll come and tell the Congress what we might do, and we might seek congressional approval.' And I just want to say to you that's a big [deal]." Panetta said a NATO or United <b>...</b>

2:25

Kofi Annan: Killings in Syria Must Stop

Kofi Annan: Killings in Syria Must Stop

BY CELIA MURRAY Activist groups say more civilians have been brutally killed and tortured over the weekend in areas of Syria. This comes as the former Secretary-General of the UN Kofi Annan left the country after failed peace talks. The New York times has a closer look at the details, "Activist groups said a dozen and possibly as many as 45 people, including children, died overnight. Activist videos posted online purported to attest to the killing and mutilation of children, and at least six dead adults were shown covered with sheets and blood-stained blankets." Reports are that more than one hundred civilians were killed this weekend alone. So far the UN has recorded more than 7500 Syrian citizens killed by forces supporting President Bashar al-Assad. Annan had talks with Assad to try and promote a peaceful resolution. CNN's Nic Robertson spoke about the effect he had. NIC ROBERTSON: "Kofi Annan's mission: to get a cease fire. Annan is the most senior diplomat yet to tell Assad to his face - 'stop the killing'. It had no immediate impact." The UN's security council is in lock down over these recent events. Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon and US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are calling for a united action against the violence. However, as The Los Angeles Times reiterates, the biggest obstacle is other international powerhouses. "Russia and China last month vetoed a US-backed Security Council resolution that called on Assad to relinquish power. Russia is backing a new <b>...</b>

1:14

Syria's Assad rebuffs Annan, troops attack Idlib

Syria's Assad rebuffs Annan, troops attack Idlib

BEIRUT (Reuters) - President Bashar al-Assad told UN/Arab League envoy Kofi Annan on Saturday that no political solution was possible in Syria while "terrorist" groups were destabilizing the country. "Syria is ready to make a success of any honest effort to find a solution for the events it is witnessing," state news agency SANA quoted Assad as telling his guest. "No political dialogue or political activity can succeed while there are armed terrorist groups operating and spreading chaos and instability," the Syrian leader said after about two hours of talks with the former UN secretary-general. While they discussed Annan's peace mission, Syrian troops were assaulting the northwestern city of Idlib, a rebel bastion. "Regime forces have just stormed into Idlib with tanks and heavy shelling is now taking place," said an activist contacted by telephone, the sound of explosions punctuating the call. There was no immediate comment from Annan after his meeting with Assad, aimed at halting bloodshed that has cost thousands of lives since a popular uprising erupted a year ago. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who met Annan in Cairo earlier in the day, told the Arab League his country was "not protecting any regime", but did not believe the Syrian crisis could be blamed on one side alone. He called for a ceasefire and humanitarian aid access, but Qatar and Saudi Arabia sharply criticized Moscow's stance. "TRUCE NOT ENOUGH" Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim al <b>...</b>

3:24

Syrian Opposition Visits China, Why Is the CCP Inconsistent?

Syrian Opposition Visits China, Why Is the CCP Inconsistent?

Follow us on TWITTER: twitter.com Like us on FACEBOOK: www.facebook.com On February 4th, at the UN resolution the Security Council voted to "stop the Syrian government's massacre of Syrians" However the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) cast a veto. But after less than a week, CCP Foreign Ministry said that the Syrian opposition recently visited China. Then, why are CCP's actions so contradictory? Let us look at the analysis from the outside world. On February 9th, CCP Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Weimin spoke at a regular press conference. He said that, from February 6th to 9th, Syrian Opposition Sea Sam Mak, Deputy Coordinator of "the national democratic forces of change national coordinating body", visited China, together with a delegation. However, a few days before, the CCP had expressed support for the current government of Syria. They rejected a UN resolution to stop the Syrian Government of the people. The CCP's actions are so inconsistent, why? Ma Xiaoming, former Shaanxi TV reporter, analyzed and pointed out that this is the usual double-dealing standard. The CCP does this for diplomatic propaganda and communications. Ma Xiaoming: "Their feet occupy two boats, because dictators can't be long-lived, it will not last long. I think (the CCP) also wants to build relationships with the Syrian opposition." After CCP cast veto in UN, it was strongly condemned by the public. The Australian Prime Minister accused the CCP of Irresponsible behavior. The French Foreign <b>...</b>

5:01

Tarpley: US, NATO want no dialogue on Syria

Tarpley: US, NATO want no dialogue on Syria

www.presstv.ir The UN General Assembly has adopted an anti-Syria resolution that was drafted by the Arab League and backed by the United States and the United Kingdom. On Thursday, 137 members of the UN voted in favor of the resolution, while 12, including Russia and China, voted against the measure. Press TV has interviewed Dr. Webster Tarpley, author and historian from Washington, to further discuss the issue. The following is an approximate transcription of the interview. Press TV: Arguments have been made both for and against the fact that the adoption of such a resolution can give the green light to a military intervention in Syria. Where do you stand on that? Tarpley: Well, it's hard to see how this could make any armed action legal, just because of the way the UN is set up, as resolutions, the chapter 7 armed force international peace and security resolution have to go through the Security Council. And as you mentioned, this particular one has already been rejected twice with the cross vetoes because of the Chinese and Russians, once in October and now again in February. It is rather a kind sour grape; it is kind of a desperate ploy by Susan Rice and her gang of puppets and people that she bosses around to try to bring this to the UN General Assembly. I think it's also interesting to see, who voted against this, because it's a very large part of the world. The largest country geographically, Russia, was against it, the largest demographically, China, was against it <b>...</b>

15:02

GGN: Iran Attack Fades High Gas Prices Stay, West Ensures More Syrian Violence, PsyOp Unit to Africa

GGN: Iran Attack Fades High Gas Prices Stay, West Ensures More Syrian Violence, PsyOp Unit to Africa

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE Please visit: www.ggnonline.com or http for the latest news commentary by Global Government News Please donate to GGN: www.paypal.com because it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. HEADLINES WITH LINKS: Would intervention end civilian deaths in Syria? bit.ly Syria warned by Hillary Clinton to implement Kofi Annan peace plan bit.ly Syria accepts April 10 peace plan deadline: Annan bit.ly UN Security Council Endorses Deadline for Syria bit.ly Russia rejects deadline for Annan's Syria peace plan yhoo.it Friends of Syria undermine peace process - Lavrov bit.ly Russia warns West, Arabs against arming Syria rebels yhoo.it Syria says terrorist acts on rise despite Annan plan bit.ly 'Syria unrest benefits Israel' bit.ly Hersh: US facilitates MEK terror in Iran bit.ly Report says Israel may delay Iran attack bit.ly Russia, Iran set to counter US/Israeli strike against Iran. US-led naval drill bit.ly 'Confrontation with Iran may be delayed to 2013' bit.ly Scoop: Israeli Iran Attack to Coincide With Next Israeli Election bit.ly US Aircraft Carriers Departing Persian Gulf bit.ly Israel's plan to attack Iran put on hold until next year at the earliest bit.ly Rocket fired from Egypt hits Israeli city of Eilat bbc.in Iron Dome ? the newly beloved missile defense system that nobody wanted bit.ly White House ignores Congress, sends all $1.5 billion in aid to Egypt in one transfer bit.ly Officials from Egypt's Brotherhood at White House yhoo.it Britain mulls buying <b>...</b>

Source: http://article.wn.com/view/2012/05/30/West_mulls_military_action_against_Syria_Allout_chaos_or_mor/

cnn world news ufo cnn world news video

Annan says Syria 'at a tipping point' after massacre

BEIRUT ? U.S. and world leaders dramatically increased pressure on Syria in the wake of a civilian massacre, with special envoy Kofi Annan declaring the country to be at a tipping point and urging its president to implement a peace plan that could fatally weaken his grip on power.

Annan spoke Tuesday in the Syrian capital as a group of nations ? including the United States, Britain, France and Australia ? expelled Syrian diplomats in an orchestrated response to last week's massacre of more than 100 people, the majority of them women and children, in the central Syrian township of Houla.

Most of the victims were initially thought to have died in government shelling, but the U.N. human rights office said Tuesday that evidence indicated most were summarily executed in a house-to-house rampage Friday. The U.N. said residents who were interviewed blamed shabiha, pro-government militiamen who rights groups say have acted as regime enforcers and executioners.

The Syrian government has denied responsibility for the massacre, whose graphic images of bloodied and mangled corpses have prompted global revulsion. State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland on Tuesday condemned what she called an "absolutely indefensible, vile, despicable massacre."

Nuland said the United States would look for ways to "tighten the noose" around the regime of President Bashar Assad.

Germany and Britain said they were expelling the Syrian ambassadors to their countries, and the U.S. said it was giving the charge d'affaires, the top Syrian diplomat in Washington, 72 hours to leave.

Adding to the pressure, Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, suggested in an interview with Fox News that escalating "atrocities" in Syria could lead to military intervention. The U.S. and its allies, which launched an intensive bombing campaign that helped bring down Libyan leader Moammar Kadafi last year, have generally downplayed the possibility of intervention in Syria.

Annan called on the government and "all government-backed militias" to "stop all military operations and show maximum restraint."

"We are at a tipping point. The Syrian people do not want the future to be one of bloodshed and division. Yet the killings continue and the abuses are still with us today," he said.

The special envoy did not say what consequences the government would face for defying the peace effort.

"For the sake of Syria, and for the region, we must end this violence and begin to restore hope in a political transition to a democratic future," Annan said.

It is still far from certain whether Western countries have the appetite to intervene. But some analysts said Syria's president appeared more boxed in now than at any time during the 14-month rebellion.

"Houla was really a watershed," said Fawaz Gerges, who heads the Middle East Center at the London School of Economics. "Assad is in a very precarious position right now.... If I were President Assad in Damascus, I would think twice before I do the same thing I have been doing for the past 12 months."

Before Friday's massacre, Assad seemed to have reached a stable position, pursuing what he called political reforms but which his critics dismissed as window dressing. Meanwhile, he used his powerful security apparatus to put down the rebellious masses. On the international front, he could count on the protection of Moscow.

But Russia is heavily invested in the U.N. peace plan, which calls for Assad to pull his troops and heavy weapons out of Syria's cities.

The opposition has been skeptical of Annan's peace plan, generally viewing it as a smoke screen for Assad to buy time and placate his international patrons. Complying with the plan now, however, would carry profound risks for Assad. The opposition will benefit if he is pressured to withdraw forces, allow freedom of expression and release political prisoners, all mandates of the U.N.'s six-point peace plan.

True compliance would allow Syrians to demonstrate freely, a scenario that would open the door for opposition forces to exert control over large parts of Syria that are sympathetic to the uprising.

"For Assad, the Annan plan is political suicide," Gerges said. "He cannot afford to pull out his armor. He cannot afford to allow demonstrations on a daily basis. That means he will lose control. It would be like Tunisia or Egypt."

On the other hand, if Assad does nothing he risks alienating Russia, which has vetoed two efforts by the U.N. Security Council to condemn his crackdown on protesters and stands in the way of toughening economic sanctions, trade restrictions and other punishment already imposed on Syria.

"Moscow has acquired a central role through the Annan plan, wants to see it survive, and may realize that the conflict is deteriorating to the point where [the plan's] sustainability could be compromised," said Peter Harling of the International Crisis Group think tank. Russia may conclude "that this is the time to push for a genuine political solution."

Russia and China did sign a nonbinding Security Council statement Sunday that assailed Syria for the artillery and tank bombardment of Houla.

The massacre has reverberated in Syria, prompting a new round of antigovernment demonstrations and a strike by shopkeepers in Damascus that could signal a weakening in the support for Assad among the conservative merchant class, long a key pro-government constituency.

If Assad makes no concessions, he may also face renewed international calls for a buffer zone to be set up in western Syria to protect civilians. Such a zone, theoretically beyond the reach of Syrian government forces, would probably also be used as a staging area by rebel forces trying to oust Assad.

The border region adjacent to Turkey, which already hosts thousands of Syrian refugees and many rebel fighters, is a probable location for such a zone.

And Assad may see renewed calls from Saudi Arabia and other Persian Gulf states to arm the rebels. Officials in the gulf nations had expressed concern about the danger to Syria's Sunni Muslims at the hands of Assad's security apparatus. Many senior security officials, like Assad, are Alawites, adherents of an offshoot of Shiite Islam.

Most of the dead in Houla were said to be Sunnis, who make up the majority of Syria's population.

patrick.mcdonnell@latimes.com

Special correspondent Rima Marrouch in Amman, Jordan, contributed to this report.

Source: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-syria-diplomacy-20120530,0,7401114.story?track=rss

world news daily telegraph world news daily video world news daily wiki world news daily.com world news for kids

U.N. monitors say 13 killed in cold blood in Syria

BEIRUT (Reuters) - Western powers expelled Syria's envoys on Tuesday in outrage at a massacre of 108 people, almost half of them children, and peace envoy Kofi Annan urged President Bashar al-Assad to halt the bloodshed as "a tipping point" had been reached.

The killings in the town of Houla drew a chorus of condemnation from around the world, with the United Nations saying entire families were killed in their homes on Friday, some by army tanks and others probably by pro-Assad militia.

"Bashar al-Assad is the murderer of his people," French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius told Le Monde. "He must relinquish power. The sooner the better."

U.S. State Department spokeswoman described an "absolutely indefensible, vile, despicable massacre against innocent children, women, shot at point blank range by regime thugs."

U.N. peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous, whose monitors are in Syria, contradicted the Assad's government assertion that the killings were carried out by terrorist gangs.

"Part of the victims had been killed by artillery shells, now that points ever so clearly to the responsibility of the government. Only the government has heavy weapons, has tanks, has howitzers," Ladsous told reporters, adding:

"But there are also victims from individual weapons, victims from knife wounds and that of course is less clear but probably points the way to the (pro-Assad) shabbihas, the local militia."

The United States, France, Britain, Canada, Germany, Italy, Spain, Australia and Bulgaria gave Syria's envoys hours or days to leave their capitals in a coordinated move meant to isolate Assad further diplomatically.

Some had already expelled ambassadors or downgraded ties and so, like Washington, ordered out less senior charges d'affaires.

Western countries that have called for Assad to step down hope the Houla killings will tip global opinion, notably that of Syria's main protector Russia, towards more effective action.

The killings have contributed to doubt about whether a peace plan backed by Annan, a former U.N. secretary general, has any chance of success. Some of Assad's opponents say Annan's plan is only making the situation worse by buying Assad time.

"WE ARE AT A TIPPING POINT"

Annan said that in his talks with the Syrian leader in Damascus he "conveyed in frank terms the grave concern of the international community about the violence in Syria, including the recent shocking events in Houla."

"We are at a tipping point. The Syrian people do not want the future to be one of bloodshed and division. Yet the killings continue and the abuses are still with us today."

More than 10,000 people have died in the uprising against Assad and a crackdown by his loyalists, which began in March last year as part of a wave of revolts across the Arab world.

Western leaders have loudly called for Assad to go for months, but have so far shown little appetite for the sort of armed intervention that toppled Libya's Muammar Gaddafi last year. Any suggestion that force might be threatened has been blocked at the U.N. Security Council by Moscow and Beijing.

French President Francois Hollande said armed intervention could not be ruled out, but only with Security Council support.

"Military intervention is not excluded, provided it is carried out under the auspices of international law, namely a Security Council resolution," he told France 2 TV. "It is down to myself and others to convince Russia and China, and also to find a solution which is not necessarily a military one."

White House spokesman Jay Carney said the United States had not taken any options - including military intervention - off the table, but believed armed action was not the right course at present because it would lead to greater carnage and chaos.

Moscow backed a non-binding U.N. Security Council text on Sunday criticizing the use of artillery and tanks in Houla, but has twice vetoed tougher resolutions. It has shown little sign of changing its stance this week.

Vladimir Chizhov, Moscow's envoy to the EU, criticized the Western expulsions of Syrian envoys: "I believe it rarely is conducive to maintaining dialogue with the other side."

Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Moscow was "alarmed that some countries ... are starting to use this event as an excuse to put forth demands of the need for military action in an attempt to put pressure on the U.N. Security Council."

"We are troubled by the ceaseless attempts to frustrate Kofi Annan's peace plan."

Annan urged the armed opposition to cease violence but appealed first to the government, as the stronger party, to take "bold steps now - not tomorrow, now" by stopping all military operations and showing "maximum restraint".

The plan calls for the government to withdraw all heavy weapons from towns and cities, followed by a cessation of fighting and dialogue with the opposition, but has stalled at the first hurdle.

Assad's government denied having anything to do with the deaths in Houla, or even having heavy weapons in the area, despite the contrary evidence found by United Nations monitors.

Assad himself repeated to Annan Syria's line that "terrorist groups" - Syria's term for the rebels - were stepping up killings and kidnappings across the country.

Syrian Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad told reporters: "Syria has not committed a single violation of Annan's plan or the initial understanding between Syria and the United Nations.

"At the same time, the other party has not committed to a single point. This means that there is a decision by the armed groups and the opposition not to implement Annan's plan and to make it fail."

The estimated number of internally displaced Syrians has more than doubled to 500,000 since an April 12 ceasefire and the flow of refugees abroad has gathered pace again, U.N. officials said on Tuesday.

SPENT SHELLS AND TANK TRACKS

U.N. monitors found spent shells and fresh tank tracks in Houla, evidence of weaponry that Syria's lightly-armed rebels do not have in their arsenal.

But the U.N. human rights office in Geneva said the bulk of the 108 mostly civilian dead in Houla had been executed at close range. Survivors told U.N. investigators that the killers were pro-Assad "shabbiha" militiamen, who in the past have assaulted and intimidated hotbeds of opposition to Assad.

"What is very clear is that this was an absolutely abominable event that took place in Houla, and at least a substantial part of it were summary executions of civilians - women and children," said Rupert Colville, spokesman for the U.N. human rights office in Geneva.

He said 49 children and 32 women were among the dead. "At this point, it looks like entire families were shot in their houses."

The report was at odds with a note sent by Syria to the Security Council that said: "Not a single tank entered the region and the Syrian army was in a state of self-defense ...

"The terrorist armed groups ... entered with the purpose of killing and the best proof of that is the killing by knives, which is the signature of terrorist groups who massacre according to the Islamist way."

Gruesome video footage distributed by opposition activists has helped to shake world opinion out of growing indifference to a conflict in which more than 10,000 have been killed.

Opposition sources said rebels had killed 20 soldiers in heavy fighting close to the border with Turkey.

They said six civilians and six rebels, including two commanders, had also been killed over the past 24 hours in fighting that began when the army launched an offensive with tanks and helicopters to retake the region around Atareb.

(Writing by Kevin Liffey and Peter Graff; Editing by Jon Hemming)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/west-expels-envoys-over-massacre-syrian-children-064007147.html

abc world news with diane sawyer 2011 abc world news with diane sawyer video abc world news with donnie mcclurkin ally asl on world news with diane sawyer andrew maguire king world news

Spain's Banking Crisis Is No Longer a Laughing Matter

President of Bankia, Jose Ignacio Goirigolzarri, speaks during a press conference, in Madrid on May 26, 2012. Spain's fourth-biggest bank, Bankia, said it will ask the government for 19 billion euros ($24 billion) in the largest bank bailout in the country's history.

DANI POZODANI POZO / AFP / GettyImages

At a convenience store just off of Madrid's Plaza Mayor this past weekend, a customer paid for a sixpack with his debit card. Noting the name of the bank on the card, cashier Juanjo Mart�nez couldn't resist a joke. "Sure you don't want to buy anything else?" he asked. "Might as well use it while you still can."

The humor in Spain has been dark ever since the crisis began four years ago. But in recent weeks, and especially in the past few days, the mood has turned decidedly blacker. On May 25, Bankia, the country's fourth largest bank, admitted that it needed a total infusion of 23 billion euros in public funds to avoid bankruptcy. That same day, and every weekday since, the spread between Spain's 10-year government bonds and their German counterparts has remained above the critical red line of 500, beyond which it becomes nearly impossible for a country to finance its debt. Gradually, the gallows humor is giving way to outrage.

(PHOTOS: The New Castles of Spain: Victims of the Euro Crisis)

It's hard to say who is the bigger target of it: Spain's government or its banks. They are, in any case, inextricably linked. It was the government, after all ? then led by the Socialist party ? that created Bankia in December 2010 by merging seven savings banks on the verge of default in the hopes that a larger entity would be better able to withstand the toxic assets plaguing Spain's lenders. At its head was Rodrigo Rato, former IMF chief, and a high-ranking member of the center-right Popular Party, which won Spain's national elections elections the following year. On May 7, Rato abruptly resigned that position and his replacement requested that the government partially nationalize the bank. Two weeks later, Bankia admitted that, contrary to a February report that recorded 305 million in profits, it had in fact lost nearly 3 billion euros in 2011. On May 25, the bank's advisory board resigned en masse, though not before requesting an additional 19 million euros from the government ? an amount which the government, despite promises not to spend public money bailing out banks, agreed to supply. Three days later, Bankia's parent company, BFA, announced that it too was 3.3 billion in the hole ? the largest loss in Spain's history.

The ridiculousness of the situation ? it's hard to say whether its worse to believe that a bank led by the former head of the IMF deliberately lied to its shareholders or that it simply couldn't keep its profits and losses straight ? has provided plenty of comedic fodder. "Government To Hand Over 700 Virgins to Bankia" ran the headline of a story in the satiric newspaper Rokambol, in reference to to prime minister Mariano Rajoy's willingness to meet the astonishing demands of the bank. One blog recently began offering a special edition Playmobil Bankia toy, with the promise that it would give kids the chance to "discover the only bank in the world where the robber sits behind the counter!" Price tag? 20 billion euros, of course.

(PHOTOS: Police and Protesters Clash in Spain)

Beneath the humor lies no small amount of anxiety. Ten million Spaniards have accounts with Bankia, and another 400,000 have invested in its stocks. Mari Montoyo is one of the former, and she admits that she worries constantly about her funds. "I wake up every morning and wonder if I should empty out my account," the 47-year-old housewife says. "Maybe it would be safer hidden in a drawer at home." Medium Miguel Morales, who has been telling fortunes for over 30 years, says he is seeing a lot of that kind of doubt. "I used to get very few people seeking financial advice," he says. "But right now I'd say about half my clients ask if they should keep their money in one bank, or invest in another."

Until now, even as the unemployment rate has passed 23% and austerity measures have reduced pensions, made it easier to fire employees, and cut social welfare benefits, Spain has largely avoided the kind of rage that has exploded on the streets of Greece. But there are signs that that may be changing. "I think this is the straw that breaks the camel's back," says Ignacio Escolar, former editor of Politico newspaper and creator of one of Spain's most popular political blogs, Escolar.net. "The government is going to inject more than twice the amount of public money it has cut from education and healthcare into a bank. We have no money to pay teachers, but we have money to pay Bankia. If you look on social media, it's sparking a lot of anger."

(MORE: The Vanguard of Disaster)

There was perhaps no more potent sign of that anger than Karlos Angui�ano's outburst on television last week. As the normally jovial chef on Spain's most popular cooking show chopped vegetables for a sofrito last week, he began to describe his distress at recent cuts to education. From there, it was a short leap to the bankers. "We've all been affected by this crisis," Argui�ano said. "But we're feeling it not because of teachers or students. We're feeling it because of those gangsters ? those bankers who are running the crisis."

Spurring the growing rage is the sense that the government is making it up as it goes along. Certain promises ? like it would not raise the Value Added Tax, or create a "bad bank" into which others could offload their toxic assets ? have been discarded in the face of necessity. "What the prime minister says today, he may well discard tomorrow," said I�aki Gabilondo, Spain's most prominent television journalist in a broadcase on May 29th. "Not just because he keeps contradicting himself. But because you can see that he is completely overwhelmed by what is happening."

(MORE: Obama's European Stimulus Challenge)

The day before, Rajoy had tried to be firm. Holding his first press conference since his inauguration in January, the prime minister answered a journalist's question about a possible rescue from Europe with what may well turn out to be his "Read my lips" moment: "There will be no bailout. Next question?" But he also refused to hold a public investigation into what and who is responsible for Bankia's default, and in the process, only spurred more resentment. "As a journalist, I know that there's not much alternative to saving Bankia with public money, says Escolar. "But for them to do it without any transparency or explanation is deeply troubling. They're treating it as if it were a hurricane ? a natural disaster that no one could control and for which no one is responsible."

On May 29th, as the spread remained above 500 points and BFA confessed that it held 40 billion in toxic assets, Twitter lit up with the news that one of Bankia's directors had received a 14 million euro severance payment. "They're all a bunch of shameless thieves," said Monica Besado, 21, as she stopped by her neighborhood branch of Caja Madrid, one of savings banks that makes up Bankia. "I would take all my money out, but I don't think anyone else is any better. Unless you want to leave Spain, there's no place else to go."

MORE: Spanish Banking Troubles Keep Markets on Edge

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/time/world/~3/GG3H9IdFuu0/0,8599,2115950,00.html

abc world news theme abc world news this morning abc world news today abc world news tonight abc world news tonight anchor

U.S. Frustration on Iran and Syria Puts New Cards in Russia's Hands

Denis Sinyakov / Reuters

Denis Sinyakov / Reuters

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov attends a news conference in Moscow on May 28, 2012

Russia?s help will be crucial for President Barack Obama in addressing the crisis in Syria�and the Iran nuclear standoff, but President Vladimir Putin is playing hard to get. Since resuming the presidency three weeks ago after a four-year, constitutionally mandated sabbatical in the role of Prime Minister, Putin pointedly snubbed the G-8 summit hosted by Obama at Camp David, instead sending Prime Minister Dmitri Medvedev. Obama and Putin have finally agreed on a date and venue for a t�te-�-t�te, even if the timing is a little fraught: they plan to huddle on the sidelines of G-20 meeting in the Mexican city of Los Cabos from June 18 to 19. Curiously enough, the same dates have been chosen for the next round of talks�between Iran and the P5+1�(the U.S., Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China), which will be held in Moscow.

There will be considerable pressure for the Moscow meetings to generate an agreement that will keep the diplomatic process going ? a tall order given the gulf between Iran and its interlocutors revealed in last week?s talks in Baghdad.�The Iranians were shocked by the P5+1 offering no prospect of relief from sanctions targeting Iran?s oil and banking sector, even if it agreed to the confidence-building steps proposed by the world powers. (They asked Iran to halt uranium enrichment to 20% purity, ship out its stockpile of such material and cease operations at its Fordow enrichment plant buried deep in a mountainside near Qom.) Those steps would buy only minor concessions from Western powers, which made it clear that the only way to stop the unprecedented European oil embargo and measures against Iran?s banks was to heed U.N. Security Council demands that it freeze all uranium enrichment.

(MORE: Political Pressure Mounts Ahead of Iran Nuclear Talks)

The new sanctions take effect on July 1, just two weeks after the Moscow talks, and if they are demonstrably implemented, it may become more difficult politically�for Iran?s leaders to stay at the table. (Any inclination toward defiance will be reinforced by a belief in Tehran that Western leaders, given their economic crisis, need the diplomacy as much, if not more, than Iran does.) Iran remains steadfast in refusing the demand that it halt all enrichment and refuses to engage in any process designed to reach that end point. As a result, Iranian officials warned that they were being offered no incentive to take confidence-building steps on issues like 20% enrichment.

Obama?s election-season concerns work against the idea of concessions to Iran, and Israel is pushing him to�take an even tougher line.�Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday branded anything less than a complete halt to all enrichment in Iran an unacceptable outcome. And, of course, the minimum being demanded by the Israelis far exceeds the maximum Iran would likely concede. Israel?s Deputy Prime Minister Moshe Yaalon told an Israel radio station that the talks were simply giving Iran more time: ?To my regret, I don?t see any sense of urgency,? Yaalon was quoted as saying, ?and perhaps it is even in the interest of some players in the West to stretch out the time, which would certainly square with the Iranian interest.?

(MORE: Long-Term Uncertainty Remains in Nuclear Talks with Iran)

Yaalon may not be wrong: while the Israelis tap their watches, most Western leaders don?t share their minutes-to-midnight assessment and oppose military action at a point where Iran is accumulating the means to build nuclear weapons, but hasn?t yet taken a decision to build them.�Still, the Israeli pressure tends to reverberate on Capitol Hill, restraining Obama?s political room for maneuver on the Iran issue. The President certainly wants to avoid being steamrollered into any confrontation. If he?s to show progress on his own strategy for dealing with Iran, he?ll need Putin?s help.

Iran is at the negotiating table partly because its presumptive allies, Russia and China, demand that it take steps to demonstrate the peaceful intent of its nuclear program. The current negotiating framework ? which proposes step-by-step reciprocal moves to ease the standoff ? was originally devised by the Russians. Hope of persuading Iran to take measures to ease the danger of confrontation has always rested more on the position of Iran?s friends and most important trading partners, than on the tough line taken by Western governments that Tehran is hardwired to defy.�Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov last week insisted that Iranian steps toward meeting international concerns should be greeted with an easing of sanctions. The ability of the P5+1 to launch a process of reciprocal steps with Iran may depend in no small part on Russia?s ability to fashion compromises that heed the political concerns from both sides of the table.

(PHOTOS: Vladimir Putin Sworn In as Russia?s President)

But Russia?s interventions on Iran�? just as its stance on Syria�? will be driven by its own interests and Putin?s reading of them. Putin is looking to reassert Russian influence, particularly in the Middle East, and that means curbing Washington?s ability to resolve a crisis like Syria. Though Russia has lately been critical of the Assad regime, it is always careful to apportion equal blame for Syrian violence on the armed opposition and those supplying their weapons. It appears unlikely to lend its weight to any regime-change effort or to allow legal authorization for military action via the U.N.

Russia?s cooperation on Syria and Iran is likely to be based, first and foremost, on securing its own interests in how those crises are resolved. But cooperation on solving problems that are more pressing for Washington than for Moscow may also see Putin demand a quid pro quo on Russian concerns closer to home. President George W. Bush, on first meeting Putin in 2001, claimed to have looked the Russian in the eye and gotten ?a sense of his soul,? proclaiming him a ?trustworthy man.? Obama is more�likely to discover in Los Cabos that his Russian counterpart is not exactly a cheap date.

MORE: The Menu of Options in the Iranian Nuclear Talks

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/time/world/~3/c99fRrQGqD8/

rnam king world news science world news for kids top world news 2011 us world news 2011 vosizneias yeshiva world news